Comment from Anonymous

Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
Summary: The commenter supports the proposed pipeline safety rules, arguing that stricter protocols are necessary to protect public health, the environment, and workers from hazards like fires and methane leaks. They emphasize the importance of updated emergency response plans and the alignment of the proposal with environmental justice principles.
I would like to express my support for strengthening Docket No. PHMSA-2021-0046 as presented by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). While the country is still reliant on gas, we must make its transport as safe as possible. The use of gas in our homes is dangerous for health and safety reasons, from the danger of fires and explosions to exacerbating childhood asthma and impeding cognitive development. The proposed docket will protect both health and the environment. With safer and stricter pipeline protocols, there will be fewer large-scale leaks of greenhouse gases, the main driver of climate change, such as methane--leaks of which can cause effects from dizziness and rapid breathing, to injury and deaths from fires and explosions. The proposed policy also adheres to Justice40, a policy set forth to promote environmental justice, because it protects people in low-income communities and communities of color, who are more likely to live in close proximity to pipelines. Emergency response plans must be updated, and it is crucial to involve multiple parties, including but not limited to: pipeline operators, first responders, relevant government actors from the local to federal agency level, and local hospital systems. They need to be prepared for any incident along a pipeline. Moreover, pipeline operators must take on the bulk of this responsibility via improved record keeping, realistic risk management, and regular maintenance of pipelines. This process should be redundant in order to spot any issues before a small mistake creates an unsafe situation. This will not only protect the health of community members but also increase safety precautions and protections for pipeline workers. We cannot let a disaster like the one in Merrimack Valley happen again. This incident caused the evacuation of at least 15,000, loss of gas connectivity to nearly 10,000 homes for several months, 25 injuries including to first responders, and one death. PHMSA exists to ensure safety regulations are in place, making this policy paramount to its mission. This proposal can save lives and should be treated as such. I would like to see PHMSA finalize this rulemaking in such a way that public health, occupational safety, and environmental justice are at the forefront. This should be done as soon as possible to avert another disaster where policy has been lacking. Thank you for proposing this rule and for the opportunity to comment. This message was sent as part of a public energy safety campaign by Physicians for Social Responsibility. I am not affiliated or employed with this organization, simply participating as an individual advocate.

View on Regulations.gov