Anonymous 20 - First identified Form Letter (2) there were 3 similar letters received, total of 4.
Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed enforcement carve-outs and consultation framework, arguing they provide structural protection for politically connected banks with foreign ownership. They also request that the OCC require public records and numbers whenever a company uses its ability to freeze funds.
I ask that the OCC explain how the enforcement carve out for issuers with effective compliance programs, and the consultation framework routing enforcement through Bessent’s Treasury, will function as anything other than structural protection for a politically connected bank with a foreign co owner.
These coins also come with a switch that lets the company freeze anybody’s money in place. For this reason I also ask the OCC to require a written record and public numbers every single time that switch gets used.