Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Emily Reaser
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it imposes excessive institutional requirements and economic impacts on grantees. They characterize the information collection as a regulatory overreach that threatens academic freedom and speech at independent universities.
Stop the regulation for financial assistance rule. The NSF proposal creates additional institutional requirements, imposes significant economic impacts on grantees, and implements sweeping regulatory control over institutes of higher education via information collection. This is an attempt to regulate speech and academic freedom at independent universities and is a gross overreach of NSF's authority.