Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12989, NRC-2025-1303-0001, from Anonymous

Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed 73.55(a)(1)(i) and the performance objective of 73.55(b)(3) because they argue the 25-rem threshold is too high and could allow facilities to bypass physical security requirements for radiological sabotage. They request that the NRC require protection of engineered safety features and provide technical analyses justifying the shift in performance objectives.