Comment from Giacoppo Janice
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter, identifying as a regular person, opposes the proposed guidance due to ethical concerns regarding animal testing. They argue that animal testing is often inaccurate for humans and advocate for an end to the treatment of animals as property in laboratories.
In the year 2026, we must aim for the highest and best testing results. As a regular person, who has just been told of the, in my opinion, way in which animal are used to no good end including the well known average percentage of 92% that tests on any animal does not result accurately on humans. I've been listening to scientists explaining many scientific things but the humanity doesn't seem to be there. If it's legal in many states, including mine, to call 911 if there's time for a dog on the verge of dying in an overheated car or break a window, then why is it illegal for people to break into labs that are known to torture dogs? We as the world should not think of any animal as property. It's wrong and we need you to help change at least the U.S.