Comment from Ian Taras
Ian TarasOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter argues against the FDA's classification of various peptides as substances that may cause harm. They advocate for the continued use of these peptides for medical and performance purposes, arguing that they are safer alternatives to synthetic drugs.
The FDA, approximately 1 week ago, made a sweeping change to the classification of a large group of PEPTIDES - which are specific amino acid (protein) sequences that our human bodies (and nature) use as signals to create cellular actions. Much like bioidentical hormones, which are NOT FDA “approved,” peptides have been used in ever growing amounts across the country over the past decade to treat and heal patients where pharma cannot, where synthetic/manufactured drug side effects cannot be tolerated, or drugs even afforded. Furthermore, cognitive, performance and longevity peptides give options for those seeking natural and safe methods to enhance productivity or recovery.
Here are the peptides involved:
AOD 9604
BPC-157
CJC-1295
Dihexa
DSIP
Epitalon
GHK-Cu (for injections)
LL-37
Ibutamoren (MK677)
Ipamorelin Acetate
Kisspeptin-10
KPV
Melanotan II
MOTs-C
PEG-MGF
Selank
Semax
We would like to demand that the FDA RECONSIDER and RETRACT its unsupported claim that because these products “may or may not cause harm,” they must be removed from the population. Plenty of other products that absolutely demonstrate harm are not only prescribed, but bought over the counter (aspirin, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, bisphosphonates, monoclonal antibodies, synthetic hormones, sugar/high fructose corn syrup, tobacco, alcohol).