Comment from phaedra fegley
phaedra fegleyOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed restrictions on bulk drug substances, arguing that the decision is based on "paid influence" from pharmaceutical companies rather than scientific evidence. They claim that the peptides in question have very few side effects and request that the agency consult with experts in the field before reversing the decision.
This is a drastic overreach and terrible interpretation of the science. Of all of the compounds to impose restrictions like this, you have chosen items that have so few side effects and no reported serious side effects as the report suggests In studies, the drastic improvement with peptides is remarkable with such limited side effects. It seems this is not a ban based on fact but on a total witch hunt due to paid influence by big pharmaceutical companies. Is there anyone who was part of this decision an expert in using these peptides. Any review of the literature showing very few if any side effects? Any one speak to people who are experts in the field who have been using peptides for many years? This is a terrible decision and should be immediately reversed.