Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12562

Ryan RobertsOtherBusiness
Summary: Ryan Roberts, acting as counsel for various government contractors, requests a 60-day extension of the comment deadline for the proposed revisions to FAR Parts 3 and 49. He argues that the breadth of the proposed rule requires more time for contractors to assess practical impacts and formulate informed questions.
Re: FAR Case 2026-007; Deadline for Input on Proposed Revisions to FAR Parts 3 and 49 FAR Council, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to FAR Parts 3 and 49. As counsel to a wide variety of government contractors, including software developers, product manufacturers, and service providers, many of our clients have continued to express significant concerns about the proposed revolutionary FAR overhaul (RFO) process, especially in light of the notable differences between the originally published RFO deviations and the Proposed Rule—including provisions that extend beyond merely restructuring and simplifying the FAR. The Proposed Rule includes a host of impactful restrictions and compliance obligations for contractors, many of which may require significant modifications to the commercial operations of these entities. Given the breadth of the Proposed Rule, analyzing the new obligations, including how they will impact contractor’s current practices, and whether clarifications are needed to fully comply with the new FAR requirements, will take some time. We respectfully request the FAR Council extend the comment deadline for an additional sixty (60) days beyond the current July 23 deadline—and to do so well in advance of the deadline—to permit time for contractors to assess the practical impact of the Proposed Rule and formulate educated questions to help ensure compliance. Thank you in advance for considering this request. Ryan Roberts

View on Regulations.gov