Comment from Paul Clark
Standard AerialSupportIndividual
Summary: An individual drone operator is proposing an amendment to the regulations regarding sUAS operations near airports. They argue that flights remaining below 200 feet and within property boundaries should not require contacting an Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT).
I would like to suggest an amendment to the current regulations requiring a PIC to contact a ATCT if a sUAS is operated within 5 miles of an airport, paved runway, heliport or seaplane base of operation only if the sUAS is flown higher than 200ft.
Most, if not all, operations I intend to carry out would require a sAUS to travel no higher than treetop level that would under no practical circumstances present a danger to any kind of manned aircraft. In the unusual circumstances where I may be required to operate a sUAS higher than treetop level I would still be able to operate within a 200ft ceiling.
Most, if not all, operations would also be carried out within the boundaries of a property line, with almost all operations not even requiring the need to move the sUAS from a stationary point somewhere above or near to the building I need to photograph.
In the event I did need to fly the sUAS around the building to shoot video footage I would use an Orbit function available within the app used to control the sUAS via the CS to set a maximum radius that does not take it above the property of any neighbors.
So, to summarize. A flight plan that does not exceed 200ft should not require permission from a ATCT providing the sUAS is flown within the property boundaries surrounding a building or buildings.