Comment submitted by Clean Air Task Force et al. (Part 1 of 2)
AnonymousOpposeAdvocacy
Summary: A coalition of public interest organizations is opposing the EPA's Ozone Reclassification State Implementation Plan Rule, arguing it is legally deficient and unlawfully allows states to defer air pollution controls. They contend that the Clean Air Act requires a cumulative, graduated classification scheme where lower-level requirements serve as a mandatory baseline for all nonattainment areas.
Detailed legal and technical comments opposing EPA's proposal, submitted by Clean Air Task Force, Natural Resources Defense Council, Earthjustice, Sierra Club, Clean Wisconsin, Environmental Defense Fund, Center for Biological Diversity, and Clean Air Council ("Public Interest Organizations").
Submission 1 of 2 (comments and exhibits 1 - 10).
Attachments
- Comment (PDF)
- Ex. 1 - EPA 2013 ISA ozone EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699-0405 Part 1 (PDF)
- Ex. 1 - EPA 2013 ISA ozone EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699-0405 Part 2 (PDF)
- Ex. 1 - EPA 2013 ISA ozone EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699-0405 Part 3 (PDF)
- Ex. 1 - EPA 2013 ISA ozone EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699-0405 Part 4 (PDF)
- Ex. 1 - EPA 2013 ISA ozone EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699-0405 Part 5 (PDF)
- Ex. 2 - ALA State of the Air 2022
- Ex. 3 - Final Good Neighbor Rule Fact Sheet (PDF)
- Ex. 4 - Hunter et al - ozone inhalation
- Ex. 5 - Garcia - gestational inhalation
- Ex. 6 - Rappazzo - ozone exposure pregnancy (PDF)
- Ex. 7 - Mendola - chronic acute ozone exposure pregancy (PDF)
- Ex. 8 - ISA OZONE Final - 2020 Part 1 (PDF)
- Ex. 8 - ISA OZONE Final 2020 Part 2 (PDF)
- Ex. 8 - ISA OZONE Final-2020 Part 3 (PDF)
- Ex. 9 - Zong - short term exposure and ozone heart (PDF)
- Ex. 10 - Ensor - cardiac arrest and air pollution