Comment on DOD-2026-OS-1321-0001
AnonymousSupportOther
Summary: The commenter argues that the proposed language regarding AcqDemo adopting STRL provisions by reference is legally inaccurate due to different statutory authorities. They suggest revising the language to clarify that AcqDemo should mirror or model its practices after STRL concepts rather than adopting the provisions directly.
The proposed language stating that AcqDemo may “adopt, by reference” certain STRL provisions is not accurate and should be revised. STRL flexibilities are authorized under 10 U.S.C. 4121, whereas AcqDemo operates under 10 U.S.C. 1762. Because these demonstration projects are governed by separate statutory authorities, AcqDemo cannot legally adopt STRL provisions by reference. AcqDemo may mirror, align with, or model its practices after STRL flexibilities, but it cannot incorporate STRL authorities or provisions as if they were its own. To avoid confusion and ensure statutory compliance, the language should clarify that AcqDemo is drawing upon STRL concepts rather than adopting STRL provisions.