Comment on FR Doc # N/A
AnonymousSupportIndividual
Summary: The commenter supports the recognition of climbing as a wilderness activity and the allowance of fixed anchors, but argues that the proposed policy complicates new routing and safety. They request that the BLM simplify the authorization process for new routes and provide programmatic authorizations for specific climbing areas.
NPS-2026-0101-0001 policy would complicate new routing and would put people at risk by creating unsafe routes and conditions for climbers either repeating routes or establishing rock climbs. Our hope is that climbers are heard and we can self manage our own climbs as we have been doing.
I support the recognition that climbing is an appropriate Wilderness activity and that fixed anchors, critical pieces of the climbing safety system, are allowable in Wilderness. I also support provisions to allow climbers to place or replace fixed anchors without authorization in the event of an emergency. I appreciate that the policy protects existing climbing routes that were developed before the PARC Act was passed into law. Legacy Wilderness climbs should remain available in order to preserve America’s rich climbing legacy.
Please improve policies to expedite timely replacement of fixed anchors in order to avoid unnecessary barriers to climber safety. The authorization process for new climbing routes that require fixed anchors should be easier to navigate. Please provide a clear path for programmatic authorization, or preauthorization, at climbing areas that do not necessitate case-by-case special use permits.