Comment from Adeola , Emmanuel

Emmanuel AdeolaOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes the proposed revision and extension of information collection requirements for importing birds and bird carcasses. They argue that the burden estimates are inaccurate, the form consolidation creates logistical chaos, and the rules fail to distinguish between research birds and commercial poultry.
I HAVE A VERY STRONG ARGUMENT AGAINST THESE PROPOSALS. **What the policy does:** Extends and revises APHIS's paperwork requirements for importing pet birds, performing birds, research birds, and bird carcasses into the US — all in the name of HPAI and Newcastle Disease prevention. 5,100 respondents, 6,334 annual burden hours, and an estimated 41 minutes per response. **7 core arguments against it:** 1. **Burden estimate is fiction** — APHIS claims 41 minutes per response, but a single bird import involves permit applications, vet certificates, quarantine arrangements, and post-arrival monitoring. Real burden is likely 5 to 5 to 10 higher. The total also jumped 250% from the 2023 version with no explanation. 2. **Form consolidation creates chaos** — Key forms (VS 16-3, 16 - 6A, 17-129, 16-28, 16-29) are being moved to different information collections, splitting a single import process across three separate systems. No transition plan provided. 3. **No electronic filing system** — In 2026, importers still use paper forms, mail, and fax. No online portal, no tracking system, no automated disease-status database. Violates the Paperwork Reduction Act. 4. **Research birds treated like commercial poultry** — Scientific institutions with biocontainment facilities and IACUC oversight face the same 30 DAY quarantine and reporting as bulk commercial shipments. Disrupts conservation breeding and research timelines. 5. **Pet bird owners abandoned** — US citizens returning with their pet birds face notarization requirements, forty quarantines, and 41-minute-per-response estimates that are detached from reality. No plain-language guidance exists. 6. **Bird carcass rules are ambiguous** — Hunters can't tell what counts as "processed." Scientific specimens are caught in commercial poultry rules. No published list of processing methods that eliminate disease risk. 7. **Inadequate public notice** — No direct outreach to avian veterinarians, bird breeders, researchers, hunters, or performing-arts handlers. These aren't categories of people who read the Federal Register. MY PERSONAL CONCERNS AS A RESEARCHER - **Pet bird owner** (traveling internationally with your bird) - **Researcher / scientist** (importing birds for study) - **Importer** (commercial bird or carcass imports) - **Hunter** (bringing game bird carcasses back from abroad) - **Performer / handler** (performing birds for entertainment)

View on Regulations.gov